Got a crazy ass story to share? Think you can do better than us? Then, write for us! Drop us a line at editor@gettingdrunkinfirstclass.com.

Shame on Bain’s Lame Claim

Published on October 7, 2007 by mensamember

Bain martini

Main Entry: 1bane
Function: noun
1 a :
KILLER, SLAYER b : POISON c : DEATH, DESTRUCTION d : WOE

2 : a source of harm or ruin :
CURSE  

Now here is a company who understands consulting!  Bain knows how to mislead with statistics.  Some version of the following graphic is always the bain.com hood ornament:

Bain Outperform Market Claim

And the accompanying tagline is:

“Companies that outperform the market like to work with us; we are as passionate about their results as they are.”

And what they meant was:

“Companies with excess cash like to hire us; we are as passionate about their thick billfolds as they are.”

WORK WITH : HIRE :: RESULTS : THICK BILLFOLDS

The first time I pulled up the Bain homepage, I knew I couldn’t have been the first to notice this misleading, salacious, sexy bitch of a graph.  Sure enough, a search for “Bain claim outperform” shows that this marketing maneuver is now a poster child for the correlation vs. causation logical fallacy.  If you’ve ever been swayed by the compelling evidence that global warming is actually caused by the global decline in modern sea pirates (http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/), then you should strongly consider hiring Bain to analyze your operations data.  They might just find that your recent profit windfall is due to the periodic alignment of menstrual cycles in your firm.

Right after deciding that Bain’s marketing department was a few sandwiches short of a picnic, I realized that this marketing might be brilliantly effective in its use of a selection bias.  Consider the pitch they made to Bain management:

“Leaders dumb enough to be impressed by this pseudo-statistic will hire us.  Since they have flagged themselves as retarded, we can clearly boost their valuation with balance sheet tricks.  And if this fails?  Then we will not pitch any more work to any client who doesn’t outperform the market enough to prop up our far-flung claims.  After all, the claim doesn’t say, ‘outperform the market 4-to-1 after working with us’.”

Here’s another bullshit quote from a recent bain.com homepage:

Creating Unstoppable Growth
Chris Zook’s book shows managers how to find hidden assets in their company to help renew their core and fuel profitable business growth.

Yes, the book examines how to conceive a profit Godzilla chud-baby using hidden intangible elusive contra-assets. Fucking Unstoppable. Yes, this is possible.  Chris Zook studied Unstoppable at http://www.unstoppable.com/ and learned it had something to do with your “core”.  You like fuel?  How about growth?  Controversial: Yes.  Hell yes.  Fuel the fire.  Grow the fire.  Fire the assets.  Renew the assets.  shhhhhhh - grow

What?

Bain’s marketing department needs to watch There’s Something About Mary and learn from the 6 Minute Abs Case Study (© HBS Press) because tomorrow, readers, we will form the Infinite Growth consultancy called Kurse.  At Kurse, our clients outperform the market 16 to 1.  Our dicks out-measure the average by two standard deviations.  Kurse works on the world’s most challenging problems by serving clients including Jack Welch, all of the Fortune 100, the United Nations, all companies working on the cure for cancer, and many of the universal laws of physics.  Kurse and Kompany has no need for marketing campaigns because Kurse’s deliverables are sprinkled with pixie dust.



9 Responses to “Shame on Bain’s Lame Claim”

  1. allamericandouche Says:


    Visit allamericandouche

    A-fucking-mazing!

  2. GreenDotter Says:


    Visit GreenDotter

    Fucking unstoppable! That what GDIFC is! America! Fuck yeah! This must be important beacause I’m using lots of exclamation points!!!

  3. Anonymous Says:


    Visit Anonymous

    The writer of this article is a frustrated moron. enjoy your magnificient career at WalMart buddy…

  4. consultantguy Says:


    Visit consultantguy

    4 to 1 odds says that guy works at Bain!

  5. SarbOxConsultant Says:


    Visit SarbOxConsultant

    Give me a minute, I’ll draw up the graph to prove it.

  6. Banal Says:


    Visit Banal

    I used to work at Bain. This issue used to always come up during new hire orientation. The official response was that it’s not meant to be a cause-and-effect thing, it’s meant to say that really great companies hire Bain. Whoever wrote this hit it on the head though - none of those new-meat Baindits would have the balls to ask, “What if they are just the ones who have enough money to hire us?” Also, nobody would ask actually insightful questions like, “Of all the companies outperforming the market 4-to-1 or more AND sourcing strategy work, what’s Bain’s win rate vs. competitors when adjusted for discounting?” You don’t put that shit on your website because your target market doesn’t understand it. All that being said, Bain was, and *is*, a fantastic company to work for with outstanding people. I look back fondly on those days when I knew MS Office more intimately than I knew my wife.

    Keep up the good work.

  7. GoldmanSachs Says:


    Visit GoldmanSachs

    I also remember them fondly. Those were the days when I intimately knew your wife.

  8. HourlyRates Says:


    Visit HourlyRates

    Hahahahhaaa…. poor guy, live and learn. ;)

  9. panda Says:


    Visit panda

    hmm, well you are all misunderstanding the graph. It is measured based on a mix of stock performance, starting from the day Bain is hired (hence no use to go pitch work to google or microsoft) and extending until 6 months after bain finishes work with them. So this graph does NOT have a selection bias for rich / better-performing companies.

    On the contrary, the reason why in the end this graph is specious is: bain starts working for a client generally when the client is in dire straights, and magnitude of upside in turnaround situations is just so big, that even if only 1 out of 3 works, the mix still outperforms the market. Buy low sell high, in essence. My guess is if you took a portfolio of companies NOT using bain and tracked their stocks between when they start a turnaround / operational improvement program until the program ends, you’d see pretty spectacular results too. Not sure how much the consultants contribute to that…